INS NYC 2024 Program

Poster

Poster Session 02 Program Schedule

02/15/2024
08:00 am - 09:15 am
Room: Majestic Complex (Posters 61-120)

Poster Session 02: Aging | MCI | Neurodegenerative Disease - PART 1


Final Abstract #92

Demographic and Cognitive Predictors of Visual-Graphic Memory Test Performance

Cassandra Smith, Pacific University, Hillsboro, United States
Michael Daniel, Pacific University, Hillsboro, United States
Paul Michael, Pacific University, Hillsboro, United States

Category: Memory Functions/Amnesia

Keyword 1: cognitive functioning
Keyword 2: neuropsychological assessment

Objective:

To determine the influence of demographics and non-memory cognitive abilities on visual-graphic memory test performance in a clinical sample.

Participants and Methods:

Participants were 129 outpatients [53.5% female; mean (SD): age = 46.48(13.95); education = 14.05(2.33)] who completed neuropsychological evaluation at a neurology/neuropsychology clinic. Four separate hierarchical regression analyses were conducted: dependent variables were Rey-Complex Figure Test (RCFT) Immediate and Delay Recall and Visual Reproduction (VR I and VR II) subtests of the Wechsler Memory Scale, 4th edition (WMS-IV); independent variables were the same for each analysis and included age, gender, education, as well as neuropsychological tests of attention/working memory, visual-spatial/construction, language, and executive functions.

Results:

Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale, 4th edition Block Design accounted for 17% and 21% of the variance on Immediate and Delay Recall of RCFT, respectively (ps = .001), as well as 29% and 28% of the variance on VR I and VR II, respectively (ps = .001). No other neuropsychological tests or demographic accounted for significant variance in visual-graphic memory test scores.

Conclusions:

The only non-memory cognitive ability that accounts for significant variance in visual-graphic memory test performance for both immediate and delayed recall is domain-specific visual-spatial/constructional abilities. When interpreting below-average scores on these visual-graphic memory tests, it is important to consider to what extent they may be due to deficits in visual-spatial/construction ability versus a specific memory deficit. These results indicate below average scores of visual-graphic memory tests unlikely are due to deficits in cognitive domains other memory or visual-spatial/construction, at least for similar clinical groups.